Brown V. Louisiana Essay Example for Free

Brown V. lah EssayDuring the mid-sixties, m both African-Americans believed that civil rights should become a study priority. Young civil rights activists brought their cause to the national stage and demanded the federal govern custodyt assist them and help take apart the issues that plagued them. Many of them challenged segregation in the South by witnessing at stores and schools that practiced segregation. Despite the efforts of these groups and Supreme accost rulings that request the desegregation of buses and bus stations, violence and prejudice against African-Americans in the South continued Meyer, F. S. , 1968). In the mid-sixties many things were off limits to African-Americans. They werent revered as equals and suffered greatly because of it. Theres an unfamiliar case to most that took place in Louisiana that helped shaped the use of public facilities for all people. This case is known as Brown v. Louisiana. The Audubon regional Library in Clinton, Louisiana, Pari sh of East Feliciana did not serve blacks. Blacks, at that time, were expected to use nonpareil of twain bookmobiles. The red bookmobile served whites and the blue bookmobile served blacks.On March 7, 1964, ive young African-American males entered the adult reading room and one of the custody, Brown, requested a book called, The Story of the Negro, by Arna Bontemps. The subordinate librarian checked the card inventory and discovered that the library did not have the book. She told Brown that she would request it from the state library and he could both have it mailed to his home address or he could pick it up from the bookmobile. After the men had been given the news about the book they sat down quietly.After the men failed to leave the library, the assistant librarian requested that they go. They did not. Brown sat down while the separates stood nearby. The assistant librarian then went to the read/write head librarian who requested them to leave as well. Again, they did no t. A few moments later, the sheriff arrived and requested that they leave again, and again, they did not. The sheriff arrested them and charged them with the designing to provoke a breach of peace and failure to leave a public building when ordered to do so (Coates, R. , 2005). The five men were tried and found guilty.Brown was sentenced to pay $150 for court of justice costs or spend 90 days in Jail. The four other men were sentenced to $35 for court costs or 15 days in ail. Under Louisiana law, the convictions werent appealable because their requests for discretionary reviews were denied. The Supreme Court apt(p) certiorari. A certiorari is an extraordinary privilege injunction granted in cases that otherwise would not be entitled to review. In writing for the majority, Justice Fortas first examined whether the protesters could be convicted for refusing to leave the library.He concluded that they could not since their protest was peaceful and blacks could not be denied access since whites were allowed inwardly as well. He reviewed the onduct of the men and felt that this had no merit either. The state argued that the men were proving their intent to commove the peace and upset the librarian. Justice Fortas concluded that the arrest was a violation of the mens First and Fourteenth Amendment rights that guaranty freedom of speech and assembly and the right to opposed this opinion and took to issue with the majoritys reasoning.He disagreed that the Constitution prohibits any state from making sit-ins or stand-ups in public libraries illegal. Second, Black argued that the previous breach of the peace cases in Louisiana differed from Brown v. Louisiana. Previously there had been several other situations where there were peaceful demonstrations over judicial practices. Garner v. Louisiana (1961) involved a sit-in at a lunch counter to protest service for whites only. In Taylor v. Louisiana (1962) blacks again protested the presence of bus depot that was f or white customers only.In Coxv. Louisiana (1965) a man led a demonstration near the courthouse and Jail to protest the arrest of other demonstrations. Each of the protests, along with Brown v. Louisiana, was all orderly and peaceful and was over discriminatory practices that denied the protesters rights hat were plightd to them at a lower place the Constitution. Justice Black opposition was joined by three other Justices. They argued that the First Amendment did not guarantee to any person the right to use someone elses property even that owned by the organization and dedicated to other purposes.On Wednesday, February 23, 1966 the decision was made 5 votes for Brown and 4 against him (Coates, R. , 2005). The young men won The Courts ruling in this case, along with the others, proved vital to the Civil Rights struggles and also to the Vietnam War protests that would follow. Indeed, without these rulings the 1960s and early 1970s may have been a completely different period in time , especially when it comes to the Civil Rights movement. In the last line of Justice Blacks opinion in Brown v.Louisiana he wrote The holding in this case today makes it more(prenominal) necessary than ever that we stop and look more closely at where we are going (Meyer, F. S. , 1968). In conclusion, had it not been for demonstrations of this kind, and the Supreme Court granting certiorari there is a strong possibility that none of this would have ever taken place. Oftentimes, it is in a ime of inconvenience and suffering that the Just shall prevail, and I believe this is no different.There is more work to do tho with the Supreme Court being behind you, at least you know its not in vain.