Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Economic Interpretaion (C. A. Beard) :: essays research papers

Charles Beards "Economic" InterpretationIn 1913, Charles A. Beard (1913 1935) consolidated various scholarly views of the Constitution and, in the process, offered what became identified as "the" economical interpretation of the Constitution. Beard (pp. 16-18) argued that the formation of the Constitution was a conflict based upon competing economic interests - interests of both the proponents and opponents. In his view, the Federalists, the founders who bet oned a strong, centralized government and happy the Constitution during its drafting and ratification, were individuals whose primary economic interests were tied to personal property. They were mainly merchants, shippers, bankers, speculators, and private and public securities holders, according to Beard (pp. 31-51). The Anti-federalists, the opponents of the Constitution and supporters of a more decentralize government, were individuals whose primary economic interests were tied to real property. Beard (pp. 26-30) contended these opponents consisted primarily of more isolated, less-commercial farmers, who often were also debtors, and northern manorial planters along the Hudson River. However, Beard (pp. 29-30) maintained that umteen southern slave owning planters, who held much of their wealth in personal property, had much in common with northern merchants and financiers, and should be included as supporters of the Constitution.Beard (pp. 31-51) claimed that support for his argument could be found in the economic conditions prevailing during the 1780s. As a result, he suggested that the primary beneficiaries under the Constitution would have been individuals with commercial and pecuniary interests - particularly, those with public securities holdings who, according to Beard, had a clause included in the Constitution requiring the assumption of existing federal debt by the new national government. Commercial and fiscal interests also would benefit because of more certainty in the ru les of commerce, trade, and credit markets under the Constitution.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.